Art

May 28, 2009

Bacon For Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner

Francis Bacon at the Claude Bernard Gallery, Paris, 1977  

Francis Bacon doesn’t terrify me.  In fact, I can’t remember a time when this Irish painter, whose centennial retrospective recently opened at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, prompted anything in me other than pure fascination and awe.  I find that this opinion, much like my love of abstract expressionist master Willem de Kooning, is not one that is widely held among the people of my generation, and when defending myself I’m often left contorting my mouth into positions that look reminiscent of Bacon’s own alien-like creatures.  He’s just depressing, the dissenters say, citing the screaming, almost unrecognizable men and women who populate his sparse portraits as reason enough to stay in the 18th Century wing of the museum.  Yet, to me, Bacon’s work is a mirror more capable of reflecting a human’s flawed, dizzying existence than almost any other painter I’ve come into contact with.  And for that reason above all others, this exhibit is a must see. 

Perhaps this comfort around undeniably uncomfortable imagery stems from the fact that I was all but brainwashed into being a Bacon fan.  Any night when I crept out of my childhood bedroom to get a sip of water, I was met by four large paintings: one naked man hanging Christ-like on a pole at our stairway landing, one bed-sized self portrait of my father hanging perpendicular to Christ, and a diptych of flesh colored dog-men floating, with little more than a wooden chair filling out the pink and orange panels.  It wasn’t a Bacon original, but the painting, which my father had created over many tenuous hours at his downtown studio, may as well have had a page torn from a Bacon book nestled in the corner; the inspiration was clear.  As was the fact that my inoculation to this particular brand of art was well underway.  (There were only so many times I could walk out of my room and be frightened before the images came to be as comfortable as the pillow from which I’d just lifted my head.)

Walking around the exhibit yesterday I was reminded of the overwhelming amount of energy that explodes from each of Bacon’s canvases; the same type of jolt that used to pop my eyes open as I shuffled around the corner outside my bedroom at three A.M. 

For a painter who has openly discussed his distaste for Abstract Expressionism, Bacon, to me, employs much of the same visceral brush technique—where solid lines suddenly fade into nothingness and the only thing identifying the head of a person may be an anatomically misplaced eye socket—as the painters who were parading around New York City’s Soho at the same time Bacon was holed up in London’s equivalent.  But Bacon is able to construct a hurricane of movement within the single frame of one of his paintings that is more placed in reality than paintings by his American contemporaries.  You get the feeling that when painting portraits of his friends, or his lover George Dyer—as is the case with many pieces in this particular exhibit—he is not just documenting what is sitting on a stool beneath a light bulb in his studio; he is painting the energy in the room; he is painting his overall perception of the person, and every moment of interaction he has had with them is amalgamated into one frenzied blur.   Yet for all of his emotional accuracy, there's nothing realistic looking in his photos.  Perhaps he summed it up best when he said that "9/10ths of everything is inessential.  What is called 'reality' can be summed up in so much less."

Personally, what makes this exploration so thrilling is its closeness to dance.  Though the subject matter and use of color may seem more unsettling than your typical day watching a fairy princess at the ballet, the way Bacon tries to both contain and unleash his imagery through the canvas reminds me a lot of how a dancer interacts with a stage.  The most exciting performances, just like Bacon’s most exciting paintings (which is to say…almost all of them), are those that manage to respect their boundaries while simultaneously obliterating them and pouring out over the audience.  These paintings reach across the orchestra pit and demand that you pay attention. 

If yesterday’s crowd was any indication, this exhibit, no matter how unsettling, is a high priority destination for art lovers.  And judging from the handful of younger patrons, maybe I’m not the only Bacon lover in my age bracket.  After all, a man who shares his name with breakfast’s most delicious meat must have some universal appeal, right? 

So, Ranters, do we have any Bacon lovers here? 

November 26, 2008

Quote of the Day: 11/26/08

IMG_4361

After finishing Twilight last week--which filled my monthly quota for mind-numbing/entertaining schlock--I decided it was time to sink my teeth into something a bit meatier (damn those vampires rubbing off on me). (Actually they didn't "rub off" (ew..gross phrase) on anything...that book is about 498 pages of foreplay.)

I was pondering several unread books on my shelf when I received a package from my mother containing two new books.  Decision made.   I chose to start with Proust Was A Neuroscientist, a series of essays that demonstrate, by using specific artists as examples, how art is often a precursor to scientific fact.  I'd be joking if I didn't say much of the text is above my head (talk about poetry all you want, but once you start to mix genomes in, my brain becomes as tangled as a double helix), but I'm still finding a lot to enjoy in Jonah Lehrer's debut book.  Any doubts about my interest in the subject matter were laid to rest when I read the introduction, which includes the following quote:

"Unfortunately, our current culture subscribes to a very narrow definition of truth.  If something can't be quantified or calculated, then it can't be true.  Because this strict scientific approach has explained so much, we assume that it can explain everything.  But every method, even the experimental method, has limits.  Take the human mind.  Scientists describe our brain in terms of its physical details; they say we are nothing but a loom of electrical cells and synaptic spaces.  What science forgets is that this isn't how we experience the world.  (We feel like the ghost, not the machine.) It is ironic but true: the one reality science cannot reduce is the only reality we will ever know.  This is why we need art.  By expressing our actual experience, the artist reminds us that our science is incomplete, that no map of matter will ever explain the immateriality of our consciousness. 

The moral of this book is that we are made of art and science.  We are such stuff as dreams are made on, but we are also just stuff.  We now know enough about the brain to realize that its mystery will always remain.  Like a work of art, we exceed our materials.  Science needs art to frame the mystery, but art needs science so that not everything is a mystery.  Neither truth alone is our solution, for our reality exists in plural."

In the second chapter, I found the following quote by George Eliot:

"Art is the nearest thing to life; it is a mode of amplifying experience."

How's that for concise? 

I'm excited to see what else the book has to offer.  I have a feeling it will be much less of a tease than Stephanie Myer's juggernaut. 

August 16, 2008

Becoming Van Gogh

Img_2043_4 Every day when I walked into the house after climbing half a mountain from where the school bus dropped me off, I was greeted by a naked man bathing in shadows and assuming a semi-crucifixion pose in a painting at the landing of our entry way stairs.  Horror.  All of the neighbors must have thought we were either religious zealots or homosexuals (they were partially right, I guess).  But each time they turned to shield their eyes from the oiled penis, they saw what I saw whenever I woke up in the morning: two enormous paintings by my father, full of demonic faces, empty chairs and frenzied brushstrokes of pink, red and orange.  Without a doubt he was our neighborhood's Francis Bacon.  Hell, they are even both Irish.

Bacon's paintings are works I grew fond of in my teenage years, no doubt aided by the aesthetic taste my parents nurtured with the art hanging on our walls.  At the time, however, the paintings scared the shit out of me.  Where did this side of my father come from, I wondered.  He, the man who watched me perform plays and roller bladed with me on the weekend, somehow unleashed a Hulk-like beast capable of creating such haunting works; the stuff of nightmares, really. 

Yet at the same time I remember being inspired by him.  I often spent days in his studio downtown, a rented room in a hallway full of doors that were always hanging open revealing dusty floors covered in footprints of people I never saw -- they may have been ghosts. He'd situate me in the corner with a piece of paper and some colored pencils and let me doodle as he furrowed his brow in front of an easel, hands covered in charcoal and the smell of cigarettes. 

No matter how hard I tried, my orb-eyed stick figures were immensely displeasing.  I didn't have a knack for constructing something beautiful (or even grotesquely beautiful like some of my father's paintings) when you put tools in my hands...and to this day I still have no ability when armed with paint, crayons, colored pencils, markers, sharpies, or charcoal (which, let's face it, is way too messy for my taste).

In my childhood I was never afraid to try.  Whenever I got together with friends we ended up doing something creative, or crafty, that allowed our parents to sit quietly, or smoke a joint, or god knows what for a few hours.  Then sometime around adolescence that all stopped.  I, along with a lot of my other friends, grew self conscious of trying to do something we weren't going to be experts at.

So it was with unbridled excitement that I found myself with a paintbrush and a blank piece of paper recently.  The plans for the night had called for another trip down memory lane, as my friends and I had decided to watch Mary Poppins and devour bratwurst.  Half of the plan stayed intact, but instead of having a jolly holiday, we had a painting party. 

Jes was working on a project for an upcoming auction, but her box of colors and brushes proved too tempting for the rest of us to resist.  After completing a series of paintings on the sidewalk, we moved inside and glided our brushes over pieces of glass. We were aimless, mixing colors with each other and seeing what resulted. 

It felt great to be young enough again to find pleasure in the visceral nature of splattering paint aimlessly on a canvas, but old enough to not be scared of the slightly demonic results.  The event Jes created her painting for is called Spontaneous Construction, and I was thrilled to live up to the first part of the name and just be spontaneous. 

Img_2041

(Don't worry, she didn't get her head stuck between the wood.)

Img_2044

(Dancer foot surrounded by nail polish?)

Img_20492

(A see through canvas makes this photographer's eye very happy.)

Img_2066

(Garrett got some fuel so he could create...)

Img_2106

(His masterpieces: the devil, and me. Which is which?)

Img_2095

(Jes brought her work outside and stayed focused (even though she's out of focus).)

Img_2087

(While Garrett...)

Img_2088

(proceeded...)

Img_2089

(to explore...)

Img_2090

(new techniques/have an artistic breakdown.)

Img_20772

(I opened a sidewalk gallery of my masterpieces.)

Img_2108

(But all of my customers were busy eating food.  DRAT!)

Img_2137

(They probably would have bought Jes's beautiful piece of work anyway!)


March 26, 2008

Day Trip (Part Two: Dying in Dia)

(NOTE: All photos by Timur Civan (TC), all photos by Matthew Murphy (MM))

The car started winding along a two-lane highway and I feared my predictions were right: Carson and Timur were taking me to be put in prison in Beacon, New York.  If there’s ever a place someone needs to go when they’re low, it’s to a correctional facility to see how much lower they can get.

The trees passed, and houses the size of apartment buildings loomed on mountains all around us.  The scenery brought a comfort that disappears in places like New York City; sometimes I forget how invigorating nature can be.  As we made our way through a collection of small towns, I started to think that my REAL prediction was correct: we were on our way to Dia:Beacon, the minimalist museum in Beacon, New York. 

It wasn’t long before that idea was verified.  After a few more turns, we pulled into the parking lot and I bounded out of the car.  Carson and Timur had been raving about the museum since they took a trip there a few months ago, and I couldn’t wait to experience it myself. 
Diasign

(Even the entrance was cool looking. MM)

We entered into a small café attached to the gift shop, which gave no hint of the vast space we were about to see.  After purchasing our tickets, we wandered through a small door and let the fun begin. 

Dia is a collection of minimalist art housed in what is basically the minimalist version of the Lourve; it’s a hollowed out factory, which is such a mind-blowing space that it’s hard to focus on the art.  Fortunately, a lot of minimalist art is created with the idea of how it interacts with a given space.  This made for a unique experience observing 20th century masters like Andy Warhol, Donald Judd, Bruce Nauman, Louise Bourgeois, and Richard Serra. 

The first gallery space we entered (about the size of a football field in comparison to NYC gallery space) was a room full of multi-colored Warhol prints that hung side-to-side to create a panoramic rainbow view.  My jaw didn’t leave the hardwood floor for two hours. 

Room after room brought new things to ponder.  Minimalist artists have never been at the top of my list, but the way the gallery spaces were lit, combined with the stark contrast of the art to the pristine white walls put much of it in a new light for me.  Even something as strange as a piece of string extending floor to ceiling became an exploratory adventure.

310377774_027d99f431

(One of the gallery spaces.)

One of the most exciting things about the space was that we had it mostly to ourselves.  There were so many different rooms that it almost felt like its own self contained city.  It seemed like the space must have been a couple of city blocks in size. 

We went in knowing we had less than two hours before the museum closed, but that didn’t keep us from taking our time.  In fact, after walking miles around the gallery space, we decided to take a moment to rest…inside the Richard Serra sculptures.

N36407889_32013638_4170

(The way the light fell through the windows against the Serra sculptures was incredible. MM)

Even though photography was prohibited, we knew that we could get away with it enclosed in Serra’s warped oxidized steel masterpieces.  Timur and I whipped out our cameras and began snapping away.  After ten minutes of resting against the cold concrete floor, we decided to continue on and see the rest of the work.

N36407889_32013628_1510

(Carson was the first to hit the floor...that hair gets heavy. TC)

Mattserrain

(It wasn't long before I followed. TC)

Lookingup

(Serra meets Dia: My view from the floor.  MM)

N36407889_32013637_3890

(We finally got off the floor and wound our way out of Serra's world...MM)

Timurcarsserra

(And into another sculpture. MM)

N36407889_32013633_2797

(Time to go. MM)

Carstimurwalk

(Even outside at the museum was gorgeous.  We had a few minutes to spare so we decided to do an outdoor photoshoot. MM)

Carsonbench

(Which meant Carson got to pose a bit more. MM)

Carsoncamera

(Because she still didn't have a camera.  TC)

Hipsterview

(So only I could capture the hipster nap. MM)

Whereto

("Where to now?!" TC)

Trees

(Little did I know the day was far from over! TC)


My Photo

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Search

    • Search
      Google

      WWW
      rantingdetails.typepad.com
    Blog powered by TypePad